Last week, the judge in Epic v. Apple asked whether Epic really had an antitrust case against Apple, or whether it just wanted to help kids make impulse purchases. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers was talking about the importance of where and how people pay for their apps, and today she continued that line of questioning to the point of suggesting a kind of App Store policy change that Epic never originally put on the table.
Epic sued Apple for banning Fortnite from iOS over a direct payment system for V-Bucks, Fortnite’s in-game currency. Epic called that unfair and monopolistic. But Apple argued that it lets developers sell in-app purchases through its Safari browser, even at a discounted price — so there’s no lockout. And while Epic...
from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/3y36Da0
Epic v. Apple keeps coming back to the gap between ignorance and inconvenience
![Epic v. Apple keeps coming back to the gap between ignorance and inconvenience]()
Reviewed by Benny
on
May 11, 2021
Rating:
No comments: